When we built the Positioning Gallery, we needed a way to score positioning that was consistent, repeatable, and grounded in what actually matters to buyers. We looked at what a homepage communicates in the first 30 seconds, the claims it makes, and whether those claims hold up under scrutiny.

The result is a 7-dimension scoring model. Each dimension measures a different aspect of how a company presents itself to buyers. Together, they produce a composite score from 0 to 100.

Below is a breakdown of each dimension, how it’s scored, and what 300+ companies taught us along the way.


The seven dimensions

Can a visitor tell what you do within 3 seconds?

Low Score: The H1 uses abstract language without naming a product category or concrete problem.

High Score: A visitor knows exactly what the company does and what category it operates in within 3 seconds.
Veristone
8
Calloway
8

Havenlock
5
Prismx
3
Weight: 20%Market avg: 6.0
What good looks like: The H1 names the category, the action, and the buyer in one sentence. No ambiguity, no filler. The visitor can place you in a mental category within seconds.

Can a buyer tell you apart from competitors?

Low Score: Messaging passes the "swap test" — you could place a competitor's logo and nothing would feel out of place.

High Score: Claims are specific, evidence-backed, and couldn't appear on any competitor's site.
Nocturn
9
Corewatch
8

Talus
6
Axiom Sec
4
Weight: 25%Market avg: 5.8
What good looks like: The homepage leads with a capability that fewer than 30% of competitors claim. The claim is specific enough that swapping in a competitor's logo would break the sentence.

Does your site talk about the buyer's pain or your product's features?

Low Score: Homepage reads like an internal product spec with no mention of buyer pain.

High Score: Every section is framed around a specific buyer problem.
Ridgepoint
9
Edgecast
7

Onward IO
4
Weight: 10%Market avg: 4.2
What good looks like: Section headers describe the buyer's challenges, not features. Copy opens with the buyer's world before introducing the product. This dimension punches above its 10% weight: when it scores low, the other dimensions almost always follow.

Can a buyer verify your claims?

Low Score: No customer logos, case studies, or quantified outcomes anywhere on the homepage.

High Score: Named customers with quantified outcomes on the homepage.
Veristone
9
Nocturn
8

Havenlock
3
Prismx
2
Weight: 15%Market avg: 3.8
What good looks like: Named executives describing specific outcomes. Logo walls score low. A named customer with a quantified result on the homepage scores high. This is the widest gap in the market.

Does the site speak to a defined buyer?

Low Score: The site mentions 8+ industries with generic copy. No role or vertical focus.

High Score: Clear role mentions (CISO, SOC analyst), industry focus, or regulatory framing.
Ridgepoint
7
Calloway
7

Axiom Sec
4
Weight: 10%Market avg: 4.5
What good looks like: The homepage makes it clear who the product is for. Role mentions, industry focus, and regulatory framing (DORA implies finance) all count. Sites built for everyone resonate with no one.

Does the site acknowledge what the buyer is comparing you to?

Low Score: The homepage exists in a competitive vacuum. No mention of alternatives or status quo.

High Score: Comparative language, /vs pages, status quo framing, or comparison tables.
Corewatch
7

Edgecast
2
Talus
1
Weight: 10%Market avg: 2.1
What good looks like: The homepage acknowledges the buyer's current reality. "Unlike legacy SIEM" or "replaces manual review" tells the buyer you understand where they're coming from. Sites that ignore the comparison leave the buyer to construct their own.

Is the copy well-crafted?

Low Score: High buzzword density, bloated hero text, generic CTAs.

High Score: Clean copy, concise H1, specific CTAs, low jargon.
Nocturn
8
Veristone
7

Onward IO
5
Weight: 10%Market avg: 5.5
What good looks like: Buzzword density below 5%. H1 under 10 words. Text volume between 400-1,400 words. Specific CTAs instead of "Learn More." This dimension measures craft. Even strong positioning can be undermined by bloated, jargon-heavy copy.

The weights aren’t equal. Value Differentiation carries the most (25%) because it’s the dimension most directly tied to whether a buyer can distinguish you from competitors. Category Clarity carries 20% because if the buyer can’t place you in a mental category within 5 seconds, nothing else on the page matters.


What 300+ companies taught us

Buyer-first positioning cascades across every dimension

Companies that open with the buyer's problem tend to score well on everything else. Naming the pain forces you to pick a category, choose a differentiated angle, and prove the claim with evidence. Each dimension reinforces the next.

/ 01
Table-stakes claims dominate the middle of the pack

The most common reason for a mediocre score: leading with capabilities every competitor also has. "AI-powered," "unified platform," "comprehensive visibility" are category table-stakes. They don't hurt, but they make you invisible.

/ 02
Evidence is the widest gap in the market

The difference between top performers and everyone else is most pronounced on Specificity & Evidence. Most companies make claims. Very few prove them. Closing this gap is often the fastest path to a better score because it doesn't require repositioning. It requires better proof of the position you already have.

/ 03

Score your own homepage

You can approximate your own score by asking seven questions:

  1. Can a first-time visitor name your category in 5 seconds?
  2. Would your homepage change meaningfully if you swapped it with a competitor’s?
  3. Does your homepage talk about the buyer’s world or your product’s features?
  4. How many of your claims are backed by a named customer with a specific outcome?
  5. Could a buyer tell who your product is for within the first scroll?
  6. Does your homepage acknowledge what you replace or compete with?
  7. Is your copy concise, original, and free of buzzwords?

If you answered “no” to three or more, your positioning likely falls in the 25-50 range, the commoditized middle where 58% of cybersecurity companies live.

Want the precise score? Request a free positioning audit and we’ll run your homepage through all 7 dimensions.