Your message isn't landing.
We'll show you why.

We analyze your positioning against your top competitors across 7 dimensions and show you exactly where it breaks.

Request your free audit
innit-labs — positioning-audit
$ innit diagnose --url shieldwall.io
✔ Crawled 47 pages in 3.2s
✔ Identified category: CNAPP
⚠ H1 fails swap test — matches 6 of 9 competitors
⚠ Zero quantified proof points on homepage
⚠ No /vs comparison pages found
 
✔ Report ready → shieldwall-audit.pdf
 
→ Your angle: own what nobody claims.

Your audit in three steps.

1

Fill out the form

Your company URL, 3–4 competitor URLs, your category, and what you're experiencing. Takes 3 minutes.

~3 MIN · ONE TIME
2

We build your diagnosis

We map your positioning against competitors across homepage, LinkedIn, and analyst definitions — then pinpoint where it breaks. You'll get a scheduling link within 5 business days.

DELIVERED WITHIN 5 BUSINESS DAYS
3

We walk you through it

A 30-minute call where we walk through findings, highlight the angles your competitors miss, and outline a clear path forward.

30 MIN · NO COMMITMENT

If the audit reveals you need deeper work, we'll show you what that looks like.

If not, you still walk away with a clear diagnosis.

Here's what your audit looks like.

A real positioning diagnosis — not a deck of generalities. Below is a sample audit for a fictional AI Governance company.

AI GOVERNANCE Positioning Audit
Contex AI

"Level up your AI Security with context."

37
BrokenNeeds WorkAdequateStrong

How We Score

We evaluate positioning across 7 dimensions that determine whether a buyer trusts, understands, and acts on your homepage.

Can a visitor tell what you do within 3 seconds?

Low Score: The H1 uses abstract language without naming a product category or concrete problem.

High Score: A visitor knows exactly what the company does and what category it operates in within 3 seconds.
Robust Intelligence
8
Credo AI
7
Lakera
7
Calypso AI
5

Contex AI
3
Weight: 20%Category avg: 6.0
Best-in-class: Robust Intelligence (8/10) — Names AI Governance, specifies the buyer (ML teams + compliance), and frames the problem in one sentence. No ambiguity.

Does the homepage show quantified customer outcomes?

Low Score: No customer logos, no case studies, no metrics. Buyers have no evidence the product works.

High Score: Quantified outcomes (ROI, time saved, deployment stats) with named customers above the fold.
Credo AI
7
Robust Intelligence
6
Lakera
5
Calypso AI
4

Contex AI
2
Weight: 15%Category avg: 4.8

Does the site acknowledge alternatives and frame the decision?

Low Score: No mention of competitors, alternatives, or the status quo. Buyers are left to do their own comparison.

High Score: Frames the decision clearly — names the status quo, positions against alternatives, gives buyers a reason to switch.
Robust Intelligence
4
Credo AI
3
Calypso AI
2
Lakera
2

Contex AI
2
Weight: 10%Category avg: 2.6

Can a buyer tell you apart from competitors?

Low Score: Messaging passes the “swap test” — you could place a competitor’s logo and nothing would feel out of place.

High Score: Claims are specific, evidence-backed, and couldn’t appear on any competitor’s site.
Lakera
8
Robust Intelligence
7
Credo AI
6
Calypso AI
5

Contex AI
3
Weight: 15%Category avg: 5.8

Is the ideal buyer clearly identified?

Low Score: No mention of buyer role, team, or use case. The page speaks to “everyone.”

High Score: Specific buyer persona named (CISO, ML Engineer, Compliance Lead) with use-case context.
Credo AI
7
Robust Intelligence
7
Lakera
6
Calypso AI
5

Contex AI
5
Weight: 15%Category avg: 6.0

Is the core benefit concrete and specific?

Low Score: Benefits are vague (“better security,” “peace of mind”) with no specifics on what improves or by how much.

High Score: Concrete outcome tied to a metric or workflow (“cut audit prep from 6 weeks to 3 days”).
Robust Intelligence
7
Credo AI
6
Contex AI
6
Lakera
5
Calypso AI
4
Weight: 15%Category avg: 5.6

Does the story hold across homepage, LinkedIn, and sales materials?

Low Score: Homepage says one thing, LinkedIn says another, sales deck tells a third story. Buyers lose trust.

High Score: Consistent narrative across all channels — same category, same value prop, same proof points.
Robust Intelligence
7
Credo AI
6
Lakera
5
Calypso AI
4

Contex AI
4
Weight: 10%Category avg: 5.2

Key Findings

The tagline fails the swap test.

“Level up your AI Security with context” could belong to any of the 15 vendors in your category. It doesn’t name what you do, who it’s for, or why context matters. A buyer scanning 6 tabs won’t remember this.

/ 01
No proof anywhere on the homepage.

Zero customer logos, no case studies, no quantified outcomes. Your competitors Robust Intelligence and Credo AI both show enterprise logos and deployment metrics above the fold. You’re asking buyers to trust on faith.

/ 02
Category confusion: AI Security vs. AI Governance.

Your homepage says “AI Security” but your product is an AI Governance platform. These are different buyer personas with different budgets. Analysts place you in Governance — your website places you nowhere specific.

/ 03
Compared against
Robust Intelligence Credo AI Calypso AI Lakera

White Space & Recommended Angle

Based on our analysis of the AI Governance landscape, three positioning angles remain unclaimed by your competitors. The strongest opportunity for Contex AI is to own the intersection of runtime AI governance and compliance automation — a space where no vendor currently has clear positioning dominance. Your product's context-aware approach to policy enforcement maps directly to this gap.

Recommendation: Lead with the compliance automation angle. Frame around the buyer's pain of audit readiness, not "AI Security." Build proof around time-to-compliance as your primary metric.

Request your audit to see the full analysis

Get your free audit.

Takes about three minutes. We'll handle the rest.

List companies you actually lose deals to — not just category leaders.

Write what you'd say to a prospect — not your investor pitch category.